Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on January 9, 2006
Europace 2006 8(2):118-121; doi:10.1093/europace/euj029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/2/118    most recent
euj029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipchenca, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Glikson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipchenca, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Glikson, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

PACING

Clinical surveillance of a tined, bipolar, silicone-insulated ventricular pacing lead

Igor A. Lipchenca1,2, David S. Bar-Lev1,2, David M. Luria1,2, Osnat T. Gurevitz1,2, Chava Granit1,2, Zeev Rotstein1,2, Eli I. Ovsyshcher3, Michael Eldar1,2 and Michael Glikson1,2,*

Heart Institute Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621 Israel ; Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel ; Heart Institute, Soroka Medical CenterBen Gurion University Beer Sheba Israel

Aims This study assesses short- and long-term performance of the S80TB ventricular lead manufactured by Sorin Biomedica, Italy.

Methods and results Three hundred and thirty leads were implanted and had complete follow-up with us for a minimum of 60 months or up to failure, removal, and/or patient death (mean 40 months, range: 1 day to 81 months). Thirty-two patients (9.6%) had spontaneous lead-related complications: 7 (2.1%) occurred during the first week; 25 (7.6%) had chronic complications, of which 20 (6.1%) necessitated re-operations; 3 (0.9%) were lead material failures. Of the 110 re-operations (90 pacemaker replacements and 20 operations due to complications), 7 additional cases (6.4%) were complicated by unique connector damage that occurred during disconnection of the lead from the connector block. The Kaplan–Meier estimated 5-year lead survival free of lead material failure and free of any significant lead complication were 97.9 and 87%, respectively.

Conclusion The S80TB lead demonstrates an acceptable rate of acute and chronic spontaneous complications and very few lead material failures over 5 years of follow-up. However, there seems to be a relatively high incidence of connector damage during disconnection from the connector block. Extra caution is required during those procedures in patients with this lead.

Key Words: Pacemaker lead, Pacemaker follow-up, Lead surveillance

Corresponding author. Tel/fax: +972 3 5356605. E-mail address: mglikson{at}post.tau.ac.il


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.