Skip Navigation

Europace 2006 8(1):70-75; doi:10.1093/europace/euj017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melzer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Theres, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melzer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Theres, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


PACING

Predictors of chronotropic incompetence in the pacemaker patient population

C. Melzer1,*, J. Witte1, R. Reibis1, H.J. Bondke1, W. Combs2, K. Stangl1, G. Baumann1 and H. Theres1

Charité-Campus Mitte, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie Angiologie, Pneumologie, Schumannstrasse 20/21, D-10117 Berlin Germany ; Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, MN USA

Aims We prospectively evaluated results from cardiopulmonary exercise testing for chronotropic incompetence (CI) in a cohort of 292 pacemaker patients. In addition, we evaluated comorbidity and antiarrhythmic patient data as indicators of CI.

Methods and results On the basis of exercise stress testing and application of the definition of CI by Wilkoff, 51% of our cohort was categorized as having CI. Indications for pacemaker implant for this patient group were 42% atrioventricular block, 56% sinus node disease, and 59% atrial fibrillation. Maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max) and exercise duration were significantly reduced among CI pacemaker patients, whereas oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold remained unchanged. The following clinical characteristics were significant predictors of CI: existence of coronary artery disease (P=0.038), presence of an acquired valvular heart disease (P=0.037), and former cardiac surgery (P=0.041). Age, gender, arterial hypertension, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, and time period between stress-exercise examination and pacemaker implantation were not significant predictors of CI. Chronic antiarrhythmic therapy with digitalis (P=0.013), beta blockers (P=0.036), and amiodarone (P=0.045) were significant predictors of CI. In contrast, medication with class I and IV antiarrhythmics had no significant correlation with CI.

Conclusion We found the following characteristics predictive of CI in this pacemaker patient population: VO2 max, existence of coronary artery disease or acquired valvular heart disease, previous cardiac surgery, as well as medication with digitalis, beta blockers, and amiodarone.

Key Words: Chronotropic incompetence, Pacemaker, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing


Corresponding author. Tel: +49 30 450 513 148; fax: +49 30 450 513 915. E-mail address: christoph.melzer{at}charite.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Arena, J. Myers, M. A. Williams, M. Gulati, P. Kligfield, G. J. Balady, E. Collins, and G. Fletcher
Assessment of Functional Capacity in Clinical and Research Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing
Circulation, July 17, 2007; 116(3): 329 - 343.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.