Skip Navigation

Europace 2005 7(5):447-453; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.05.005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermida, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Delonca, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hermida, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Delonca, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Electrocardiographic predictors of Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge*

Jean-Sylvain Hermidaa,*, Isabelle Denjoyb, Geneviève Jarrya, Serge Jandauda, Cathy Bertranda and Jean Deloncaa

aAmiens-Picardie University Hospital Hôpital Sud, 80054 Amiens Cedex, France; bLariboisière University Hospital Paris, France

AIM: To identify ECG predictors of Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge.

METHODS: We studied prospectively 103 patients (M=76, 45±13 years) in whom ECGs were collected during ajmaline challenge. ECG recordings included the high right precordial leads (–2V1 and –2V2). A positive response was defined by a >0.2 mV J point or ST segment elevation and a down-sloping pattern of the ST segment in at least one right precordial lead.

RESULTS: Ajmaline challenge was positive in 48 (47%) of the 103 cases. Baseline J wave elevation was greater in –2V1 (0.077±0.078 mV vs. 0.038±0.046 mV, P=0.003) and –2V2 (0.149±0.103 mV vs. 0.043±0.088 mV, P<0.001) in cases with a subsequent positive response. In contrast, ST segment elevation and T wave amplitudes were reduced in V1, V2 and V3. Logistic regression showed that J wave elevation in –2V2 and decreased T wave amplitude in V3 at baseline were independent predictors of a positive response. Baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in –2V2 had a specificity of 100%, a sensitivity of 40%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 28%.

CONCLUSION: J wave elevation >0.16 mV in –2V2 was the strongest predictor of a Brugada type response to Na channel blockade challenge when Brugada syndrome was suspected on a baseline ECG.

Key Words: antiarrhythmia agents, genetics, electrocardiography, ion channel, Brugada syndrome


*Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 614 27 33 09; fax: +33 322 45 56 61. E-mail address: hermida.jean-sylvain{at}chu-amiens.fr (J.-S. Hermida).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.