Skip Navigation

Europace 2005 7(5):409-412; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.03.002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillock, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, I. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillock, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, I. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Radiofrequency ablation for common atrial flutter using an 8-mm tip catheter and up to 150 W

R. J. Hillock*, I. C. Melton and I. G. Crozier

Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital Christchurch, New Zealand

The formation of bi-directional block in atrial flutter can be adversely affected by problems with the delivery of effective energy related to isthmus anatomy and contact. Higher energies can produce larger and more effective lesions. The optimum setting for power delivery using temperature controlled ablation has not been established, with the maximum reported being 100 W. This is a retrospective review of the first 50 new cases assessing the efficacy and safety of using temperature controlled (60–65 °C) flutter ablation with an 8 mm tip electrode catheter and up to 150 W. All cases had either typical flutter alone (34%) or predominant flutter as the indication, no combined procedures were included. Acute procedural success was 94% and long-term success of 88%. Median number of ablations required was 11 (interquartile range 10–19), median procedure time 120 min (IQR 102–164), fluoroscopy time 22 min (IQR 17–36), radiation dose 17 Gy cm2 (IQR 10–27), median number of lines 1 (IQR 1–2). Six patients achieved 150 W, but 42 achieved >100 W (median watts 142 W, IQR 104–147). Patients (12%) experienced an uncomplicated pop during the procedure. None experienced a significant complication. There were three late relapses. The setting of 150 W maximum delivered energy in temperature regulated ablation allowed higher energies (>100 W) to be delivered in most patients. This resulted in acute and long-term success rates that compare well with the literature but is associated with a 12% rate of pop. Subsequent to this series our 54th patient sustained a pop due to high energy ablation that resulted in perforation and tamponade, from which there was survival.

Key Words: atrial flutter, catheter ablation

*Corresponding author. Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital, Riccartion Avenue, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch 8000, New Zealand. Tel.: +643 3640 640; fax: +643 3641 415. E-mail address: hillocks2005{at}yahoo.com.au (R.J. Hillock)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EuropaceHome page
A. S. Thornton and L. J. Jordaens
Atrial flutter: Watch and control?
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(5): 413 - 414.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.