Skip Navigation

Europace 2005 7(3):289; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.011
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Gelder, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pijls, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Gelder, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pijls, N. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

CP12: OPTIMIZED LV PACING BY FUSION WITH INTRINSIC RIGHT BUNDLE ACTIVATION COMPARED TO BIVENTRICULAR PACING AND THE EFFECT ON THE RIGHT VENTRICULAR ELECTROGRAM

Berry M. van Gelder, Frank A. Bracke, Albert Meijer, Art Pilmeijer and Nico HJ Pijls

Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: In patients with normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction left ventricular (LV) pacing is superior to biventricular (BiV) pacing, due to intrinsic conduction over the right bundle branch during LV pacing.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the hemodynamic effect of LV pacing and its association with the right ventricular (RV) electrogram (EGM) as an indicator of ventricular fusion.

METHODS: A BiV pacing system was implanted in 13 patients (8 males, age 66.8±10.2 years) with heart failure NYHA class III-IV, ejection fraction 21.1± 5.6% and sinus rhythm with normal AV conduction. The hemodynamic effect of LV, BiV simultaneous and (BiVsim) optimized V-V interval (BiV opt) pacing was evaluated by invasive measurement of LV dP/dt max with different AV intervals. A 12 lead ECG and the RV EGM obtained by pacemaker telemetry were recorded to evaluate fusion.

RESULTS: The RV EGM showed a dominant R wave with AV intervals starting 30 ms below the intrinsic PR time (RV R-wave), changing to a configuration with a dominant S wave at short AV delays where no fusion is present (RV S-wave). In between an intermediate RV EGM morphology is recorded (RV-inter). LV dP/dtmax for baseline was 756±167, LV (RV R-wave) 936±209, LV (RV inter) 856±193, LV (RV S-wave) 787±176, BiV sim 896±217 and BiVopt 936±216 mmHg/s.

CONCLUSION: LV pacing with the optimal AV interval (LV opt) is superior to BiV (p=0.04) and equal to BiVopt pacing. A change in the RV EGM from a prominent R wave to an intermediate morphology during LV pacing is associated with a significant decrease in LV dP/dtmax (p=0.0022). The change in the RV EGM indicates a shift in the extent of fusion from LV pacing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.