© 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Electrical storm is an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome in the era of implantable defibrillator therapy
First Cardiac Department, Hippokration General Hospital, University of Athens Athens, Greece
AIMS: Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening arrhythmia complication affecting patients treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Despite its increasing importance, existing data on prognosis and management of ICD patients affected by ES are limited and conflicting.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 169 consecutive patients receiving an ICD. Thirty-two patients presented with at least one episode of ES during the period of observation (33±26 months). ES patients were older (64±9 vs. 59±13 years, P = 0.013) with more advanced congestive heart failure (CHF) but a similar incidence of an underlying organic heart disease.
RESULTS: Long-term total and cardiac mortality were both increased among ES patients. Seventeen of the 32 ES patients died as opposed to 19 of the 137 ICD patients without ES (53 vs. 14%, P < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for the main confounders, history of ES was significantly and independently associated with total and cardiac mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 2.13, P = 0.031 and RR=2.59, P = 0.019, respectively).
CONCLUSION: ES is a relatively frequent complication affecting ICD patients treated for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although the acute management of this serious arrhythmia complication is usually successful, occurrence of ES is a strong independent predictor of poor outcome in ICD patients.
Key Words: electrical storm, implantable defibrillators, antiarrhythmic therapy
*Corresponding author. Fragogianni 34, Papagos 156 69, Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30 210 604 4863; fax: +30 210 778 4590. E-mail address: andrikop{at}hotmail.com (G.K. Andrikopoulos).
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Sapp Venturing Into the Storm Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): 456 - 457. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Carbucicchio, M. Santamaria, N. Trevisi, G. Maccabelli, F. Giraldi, G. Fassini, S. Riva, M. Moltrasio, M. Cireddu, F. Veglia, et al. Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in a Prospective Single-Center Study Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): 462 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Ezekowitz, B. H. Rowe, D. M. Dryden, N. Hooton, B. Vandermeer, C. Spooner, and F. A. McAlister Systematic Review: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for Adults with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Ann Intern Med, August 21, 2007; 147(4): 251 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Dunbar Psychosocial Issues of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2005; 14(4): 294 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.J. Jordaens and J.M. Mekel Electrical storm in the ICD era Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(2): 181 - 183. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



