Skip Navigation

Europace 2004 6(4):363-369; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2004.03.010
© 2004 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hekmat, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mehlhorn, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hekmat, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mehlhorn, U.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update{star}

K. Hekmata,*, B. Saleminkb, G. Lauterbacha, R.H.G. Schwingerc, M. Südkampa, H.J. Weberb and U. Mehlhorna

aDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cologne 50924 Cologne, Germany; bDepartment of Cardiovascular Engineering Jülich, University of Aachen Germany; cDepartment of Cardiology, University of Cologne Germany

AIMS: The aim of this study was to test pacemakers with feedthru filters for interference with a digital cellular telephone.

METHODS: The study comprised 100 patients having their first pacemaker implantation between January 2001 and May 2003. A GSM-standard cellular phone was tested in the standby, dialing and operating mode against 23 single-chamber and 77 dual-chamber pacemakers. Continuous surface electrocardiograms, intracardiac electrograms, and marker channels were recorded when calls were made by a land phone to the cellular phone.

RESULTS: In 2 patients we observed pacing inhibition with the cellular phone positioned directly above the pacemaker pocket. The unipolar and bipolar ventricular sensitivity setting was 0.25 mV in one dual-chamber pacemaker, and when we changed the sensitivity to 0.50 mV and higher no interference could be detected. The second inhibition occurred in a single-chamber pacemaker with unipolar and bipolar ventricular sensitivity setting of 0.5 mV, where a sensitivity change to 1.0 mV eliminated the interference.

CONCLUSION: Anticipating a correct setting of ventricular sensitivity, currently available pacemakers equipped with feedthru filters do not show any interference with cellular phones. Since interference was only observed with sensitivity settings below 0.50 mV, we recommend that permanent programming of ventricular sensitivity should be set at 2.0 mV and higher.

Key Words: cellular telephones, interference, feedthru filter, pacemaker

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-221-4785359; fax: +49-221-4787927. E-mail address: E-mail address: khosro.hekmat{at}medizin.uni-koeln.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.