Skip Navigation

Europace 2004 6(4):267-272; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2004.03.006
© 2004 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villani, G. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Capucci, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villani, G. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Capucci, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Reproducibility of internal atrial defibrillation threshold in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Giovanni Quinto Villani*, Massimo Francesco Piepoli and Alessandro Capucci

Cardiology Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" General Hospital 49, Via Taverna, Piacenza I-29100, Italy

BACKGROUND: Several pharmacological or technical factors may affect atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) for internal cardioversion (ICV) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS: We evaluated the reproducibility of ADFT in lone paroxysmal (electrically induced AF, 10 pts, 51 ± 4 years) or persistent AF (15 pts, 64 ± 7 years). The AF pattern (F–F interval) was characterised before each ICV attempt. A first step-up synchronised ICV test (ICV1, biphasic shock waveform 6 ms/6 ms) with increasing energy levels from 0.2 to 20 J was performed by a dual-lead defibrillation system (right atrium–coronary sinus configuration) connected to an external cardioverter defibrillator. After 30 min of stable sinus rhythm, a new sustained AF was induced (>20 min duration) and ICV protocol was repeated (ICV2). The AF cycle length was recorded for 30 s from the lateral wall of right atrium in basal condition and before each cardioversion attempt.

RESULTS: The mean values of AF cycle length before a successful shock were similar in both AF populations (paroxysmal AF: pre-ICV1 175 ± 21 ms vs pre-ICV2 181 ± 20 ms (p=NS); persistent AF pre-ICV1 194 ± 25 ms vs pre-ICV2 202 ± 15 ms (p=NS)). No significant differences were observed between the two successful ICV tests concerning intensity, energy and impedance levels. The value of ADFT energy was reproducible in paroxysmal AF population (SD differences 1.2, coefficient of variability 9.6%). In persistent AF group only the impedance was reproducible (SD differences 2.6 {Omega}, coefficient of variability 4.5%), but not the energy requirements (SD differences 9.6, coefficient of variability 44.3%).

CONCLUSIONS: ADFT is reproducible in paroxysmal AF patients, while a high coefficient of variability is present in persistent AF, possibly related to different patterns of re-entrant circuits in the reinduced AF. This observation is important in order to evaluate factors influencing ICV-ADFT correctly in AF patients.

Key Words: internal cardioversion, atrial fibrillation, electrophysiological study

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-0523-303217; fax: +39-0523-303220. E-mail address: gqvillani{at}hotmail.com (G.Q. Villani).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.