Skip Navigation

Europace 2003 5(4):411-417; doi:10.1016/S1099-5129(03)00087-4
© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Frielingsdorf, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Frielingsdorf, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with prolonged PQ interval and dual chamber pacemakers: a randomized comparison of permanent ventricular stimulation vs intrinsic AV conduction

D. E. Maurer, B. Naegeli, E. Straumann, O. Bertel and J. Frielingsdorf

Division of Cardiology, Stadtspital Triemli Zurich, Switzerland

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess quality of life (QoL) and exercise capacity during permanent ventricular stimulation (PVS) compared with intrinsic atrioventricular conduction (IAVC) in patients with dual chamber pacemakers (PMs) and an intrinsic PQ interval >210 ms. Dual chamber PMs in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block are usually programmed to PVS in VDD or DDD mode, although IAVC is preserved, but prolonged. This results in PVS, although long periods of IAVC may occur.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen consecutive patients (age 76±6 years; intermittent high degree AV block in six patients, binodal disease in eight patients) were enroled in a prospective, randomized, single blind, crossover study of IAVC vs PVC. To permit IAVC, programmed AV delays were prolonged. At the end of each phase, QoL scores were assessed using a questionnaire and echocardiography and cardiopulmonary stress tests were performed. During the study period with IAVC, 95±10% of the beats were conducted intrinsically. QoL scores (28.3±11 vs 29.3±13; P=0.68), peak exercise capacity (5.4±2.4 vs 5.2±2.9 METs; P=0.35) and peak oxygen uptake (19.8±4.5 vs 18.8±5.2 ml/kg/min; P=0.16) were comparable during IAVC and PVS, respectively. Similar echocardiographic values were found for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (50±9% vs 51±10%; P=0.67) and velocity time integral at the left ventricular outflow tract (24±5 vs 22±6 cm; P=0.20), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients with dual chamber PMs and intermittent high degree AV block neither PVS nor IAVC is superior with respect to QoL or exercise capacity. Therefore, pulse generators may be programmed to IAVC to extend their longevity.

Key Words: Pacemaker, intrinsic AV conduction, quality of life, exercise capacity

Correspondence: Dominik E. Maurer, MD, Division of Cardiology, Stadtspital Triemli, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland. Tel.: +41-1-466-1520; Fax: +41-1-466-2599. E-mail: dominik.maurer{at}triemli.stzh.ch


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EuropaceHome page
J.W.M. van Eck, N.M. van Hemel, D.E. Grobbee, E. Buskens, and K.G.M. Moons
FOLLOWPACE study: a prospective study on the cost-effectiveness of routine follow-up visits in patients with a pacemaker.
Europace, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 60 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.