Skip Navigation

Europace 2003 5(2):189-193; doi:10.1053/eupc.2002.0291
© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frogoudaki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gatzoulis, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frogoudaki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gatzoulis, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Pacing for adult patients with left atrial isomerism: efficacy and technical considerations

A. Frogoudaki1, R. Sutton2 and M. A. Gatzoulis1

1Adult Congenital Heart Programme, Royal Brompton Hospital London, U.K.; 2Pacing, Dept of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital London, U.K.

AIM: Left atrial isomerism (LAI) is an uncommon congenital heart disease, which is combined with a range of intracardiac abnormalities. Atrial arrhythmia is common in LAI. We hypothesized that permanent pacing will decrease arrhythmia recurrence in adult patients with LAI.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with LAI and permanent pacing were identified from the Royal Brompton Adult Congenital Heart Database. Hospital records were reviewed, and patients' current status was assessed with clinic reviews including standard and Holter ECGs, and transthoracic echocardiograms.

Four patients who underwent permanent pacing at the age of 27·5±11·7 years fulfilled inclusion criteria, namely permanent pacing in the setting of LAI. All 4 had sick sinus syndrome—with sustained supraventricular arrhythmia in 3—requiring several hospitalizations for arrhythmia management prior to pacing.

All 4 patients remained free of clinical arrhythmia and hospital admission at a mean follow-up of 67·0±59·5 months from pacing. The latest ECG revealed paced rhythm in all. NYHA functional class remained stable. There were no pacemaker related complications at implantation or during follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Adults with LAI benefit from pacemaker implantation, which reduces recurrence of supraventricular tachycardia and maintains atrioventricular synchrony. Future studies need to determine the preferred pacemaker mode and optimal timing for pacing.

Key Words: Left atrial isomerism, pacing, left atrial appendage, adult congenital heart disease, atrial arrhythmias


Correspondence: Dr Michael A. Gatzoulis, Director Adult Congenital Heart Programme, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, U.K. Tel.: +442073518602; Fax: +442073518629; E-mail: m.gatzoulis{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.