Skip Navigation

Europace 2002 4(3):295-302; doi:10.1053/eupc.2002.0249
© 2002 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Chierchia, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Chierchia, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


PACING

Computationally inexpensive methods for intra-cardiac atrial bipolar electrogram compression

P. Rossi1, A. Casaleggio2, M. Chiappalone2, M. Morando2, G. Corbucci3, M. Reggiani3, G. Sartori1 and S. Chierchia1

1Division of Cardiology, San Martino Hospital Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy; 2Institute of Electronic Circuits, National Research Council Via De Marini 6, 16149, Genoa, Italy; 3Vitatron Medical Italia Via Dell'Arcoveggio 49/5, 40129, Bologna, Italy

Abstract

AIM: This paper reports studies of mathematical algorithms for intra-cardiac atrial bipolar electrogram compression suitable with implementation on implantable devices.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bipolar intra-cardiac electrograms (IEGMs) of high right atrium were obtained from 20 patients who underwent electrophysiological studies for arrhythmias. Four thousand seven hundred and eighty-two seconds of IEGM were collected and divided into three rhythm groups: sinus rhythm (SR), atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL).

Since mathematical algorithms suitable for use with implantable devices demand low computational cost, we employed piecemeal linear approximation methods (ZOP — Zero Order Prediction and SAPA — Scan Along Polygonal Approximation), and beat detection method (Peak) both or which need small numbers of operations to perform electrogram compression. Compression ratio (CR) and percent root mean square difference (PRD) were used to compare the three methods, with statistical analyses performed using paired t-test.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The best performance was obtained using the Peak method which reaches an average CR of 10·6 in the case of SR group, 2·8 for AF, and 3·6 for AFL groups, respectively, while PRD lies below 2% for SR and AFL groups and 6% for the AF group. Results show that, for bipolar electrograms, the Peak method reaches statistically significant better performance (P< 0·001) in all cases except for Peak vs SAPA applied to AF (P=0·2). The number of operations necessary to compress the data indicate that time consumption can be reduced to be suitable for real time compression in implantable devices. The Peak method, which was assumed to receive the instant of occurrence of each recognized beat, from the hardware of the device, requires fewer operations than ZOP and SAPA.

Increasing the length of electrograms recorded in pacemakers will enhance the amount of information provided by the implantable device, allowing more detailed characterization of the intra-cardiac activity and leading to new perspectives in arrhythmia diagnosis and therapy. Copyright 2002 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Key Words: Intra-cardiac bipolar electrograms, data compression, pacemakers, mathematical algorithms


Correspondence: Dr Paolo Rossi, Cardiology Division, San Martino Hospital, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy. Tel: +39 010 555 3448/3453; Fax: +39 010 555 6846; E-mail: paolo.rossi{at}Hsanmartino.liguria.it


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.