Skip Navigation

Europace 2001 3(4):336-341; doi:10.1053/eupc.2001.0192
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raviele, A.
Right arrow Articles by Menozzi, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raviele, A.
Right arrow Articles by Menozzi, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


PACING

The Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing (Synpace) trial: rationale and study design

A. Raviele1, F. Giada1, R. Sutton2, P. Alboni3, M. Brignole4, A. Del Rosso5, E. di Girolamo6, R. Luise7 and C. Menozzi8

1Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Umberto I Mestre (VE), Italy; 2Royal Brompton Hospital London, UK; 3Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile Cento (FE), Italy; 4Section of Arrhythmology, Ospedale Riuniti Lavagna (GE), Italy; 5Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile Fucecchio (FI), Italy; 6Division of Cardiology, Ospedale S.S. Annunziata Chieti, Italy; 7Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile Pescara, Italy; 8Section of Arrhythmology, Ospedale S. Maria Nuova Reggio Emilia, Italy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Though vasovagal syncope probably does not directly cause death, it is often associated with severe trauma and, when recurrent, significantly impairs the patient's quality of life. While drug therapy for vasovagal syncope is still controversial, recently two randomized studies revealed the efficacy of dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in decreasing recurrences in very symptomatic patients. However, since both studies were not placebo-controlled, the benefits observed might have been due to the placebo effect of the pacemaker.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the vasovagal Syncope and pacing (Synpace) trial, a multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, is to ascertain whether, in patients suffering from recurrent vasovagal syncope, the implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with rate drop response algorithm programmed to ON, will reduce syncope relapses compared with the implantation of a pacemaker programmed to OFF. Moreover, in order to evaluate the role of the haemodynamic response during tilt-induced syncope in identifying those patients who will benefit most from pacemaker implantation, enrolled patients will be divided into two groups on the basis of their haemodynamic behaviour during tilt-induced syncope: group 1, asystolic response (development of asystole >3 s), and group 2, mixed response (development of bradycardia <60 bpm, without asystole >3 s). The head-up tilt testing protocol will consist of 20 min at 60 degrees without drug potentiation, followed by 15 min at the same inclination after 400 µg of sublingual nitroglycerin. Results from the two groups will be analysed both separately and globally. The primary clinical endpoint of the study will be syncope.

INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: To be enrolled, patients will have to meet the following criteria: at least six syncopal episodes in the patient's lifetime; positive head-up tilt testing with asystolic or mixed response; at least one syncope recurrence following a positive head-up tilt test. The following constitute exclusion criteria: non-vasovagal syncope; other indications for pacing.

SAMPLE SIZE: We hypothesize a risk of syncope recurrence of 70% after one year, and we estimate that — owing to the placebo effect alone — pacemaker will produce a 20% decrease in risk, which corresponds to a 50% risk of recurrence after one year, in those patients randomized to ‘pacemaker OFF’. We calculate conservatively a risk decrease of 60% in patients with ‘pacemaker ON’. This implies a 10% incidence of syncope recurrence after one year, vs 50% in patients with ‘pacemaker OFF’. Fifty patients will need to be enrolled in the study: 25 patients for each group.

Key Words: Vasovagal syncope, dual-chamber pacemaker


Correspondence: Antonio Raviele, MD, Ospedale Umberto I, Via Circonvallazione, 50, 30174 Mestre-Venezia, Italy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Raviele, F. Giada, C. Menozzi, G. Speca, S. Orazi, G. Gasparini, R. Sutton, M. Brignole, and for the Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing Trial Investi
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE)
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2004; 25(19): 1741 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.