Skip Navigation

Europace 2001 3(3):208-215; doi:10.1053/eupc.2001.0176
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klug, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kacet, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klug, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kacet, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Prospective evaluation of a simplified approach for common atrial flutter radio frequency ablation with only two catheters

D. Klug, D. Lacroix, C. Marquié, G. Mairesse, D. Alix, S. Dennetière, B. d'Hautefeuille, N. Zghal and S. Kacet

Department of Cardiology, University of Lille Lille, France

Intra-atrial conduction block within the inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus (IVCT) has been shown to predict successful common atrial flutter ablation. However, its demonstration requires the use of several electrode catheters and mapping of the line of block. The aim of this study was prospectively to test the feasibility of a simplified ablation procedure using only two catheters.

METHODS: Radio frequency (RF) ablation of common atrial flutter was performed in 30 patients with the sole use of a catheter for atrial pacing and a RF catheter. RF ablation lesions were created in the IVCT. Surface ECG criteria were used to monitor the conduction within the IVCT. The end point during low lateral atrial pacing was an increment in the interval between the pacing artefact and the peak of the R wave in surface lead II >50 ms and clockwise rotation of the P wave axis beyond –30° and inferiorly. Then, the line of lesions was mapped during atrial pacing with the RF catheter. Additional RF lesions were applied if mapping disclosed a zone of residual conduction. Otherwise the procedure was stopped if mapping showed parallel double potentials all along the line. Finally, the block was reassessed with a ‘Halo’ catheter.

RESULTS: Surface ECG criteria were met in 26 patients. Mapping the line of lesions showed a complete corridor of parallel double potentials in these 26 cases and in 3 of the 4 patients in whom ECG criteria were not met. Conduction evaluated with the Halo catheter showed bi-directional complete block in these 29 patients. After a follow-up of 16±4 months there was no recurrence of atrial flutter.

CONCLUSION: Surface ECG criteria combined with mapping of the line of block demonstrate evidence of bi-directional IVCT block. This simplified RF ablation of common atrial flutter is feasible with a low recurrence rate.

Key Words: Atrial flutter, radio frequency ablation


Correspondence: Didier Klug, Service de cardiologie A, Hôpital Cardiologique de Lille, Boulevard du Pr Leclercq, CHR-U 59037 Lille (Cedex) France. E-mail: dklug{at}chru-lille.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. Liew, V. Baker, L. Richmond, K. Rajappan, D. Gupta, M. Finlay, G. Thomas, M. Earley, S. Sporton, S. Harris, et al.
A randomized-controlled trial comparing conventional with minimal catheter approaches for the mapping and ablation of regular supraventricular tachycardias
Europace, May 2, 2009; (2009) eup108v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.