Skip Navigation

Europace 2001 3(2):115-123; doi:10.1053/eupc.2001.0151
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, H.
Right arrow Articles by Olshansky, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, H.
Right arrow Articles by Olshansky, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


ELETROPHYSIOLOGY

Ventricular tachycardia with QRS configuration similar to that in sinus rhythm and a myocardial origin: differential diagnosis with bundle branch reentry

H. Guo1, S. Hecker1, S. Lévy2 and B. Olshansky1

1Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center Maywood, Illinois, U.S.A; 2Division of Cardiology, University of Marseilles, School of Medicine Hôpital Nord Marseilles, France

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tachycardia with a QRS configuration which resembles that in sinus rhythm is usually thought to be supraventricular. Ventricular tachycardia, with a similar QRS configuration to that in sinus rhythm on the 12-lead ECG, can occur. The mechanisms of this form of ventricular tachycardia have not been previously reported.

METHODS AND RESULTS: The mechanism of ventricular tachycardia was defined during electrophysiological study in five patients. During sinus rhythm, all patients had a wide QRS complex (>0·12 s) on the 12-lead ECG. The morphology remained grossly unchanged during spontaneous, symptomatic tachycardia. Four of the five patients had coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. The remaining patient had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The relationship between the His bundle, deflection, the right bundle branch and the QRS complex was evaluated during tachycardia. Atrial and ventricular pacing, and ventricular activation mapping were performed during tachycardia to define the tachycardia mechanism. The tachycardia induced at electrophysiological testing, which was similar to the clinical tachycardia, was proven to be ventricular tachycardia in each patient. The morphology of ventricular tachycardia was right bundle branch block in two patients and left bundle branch block in three patients. The median tachycardia cycle length was 300 ms (range: 260–480 ms). His bundle activation occurred in a 1:1 relationship with ventricular activation during tachycardia in all patients at least intermittently. The tachycardias were thought initially to be bundle branch reentry tachycardia. With further intervention and continued observation, it became clear that His bundle activation was passive and was not required for the tachycardia to sustain. During tachycardia, His bundle activation appeared to precede the local ventricular activation. Instead, the His bundle was activated slowly from the previous ventricular beat causing a long ventricular-His (VH) interval. This was shown by: (1) activation patterns, (2) response to pacing, (3) intermittent VH dissociation, and (4) termination of ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSION: A unique form of ventricular tachycardia is described. The QRS complex morphology on the 12-lead ECG during tachycardia was grossly similar to that during sinus rhythm. The His bundle activation was passive and occurred with a long activation time from the ventricle to the His bundle. Although it mimics usual bundle branch reentry, this form of ventricular tachycardia appears to be due to a different mechanism in which the His bundle is not obligatory for the continuation of the reentrant phenomenon.

Key Words: Arrhythmia, bundle branch block, electrophysiology, reentry, tachycardia


Correspondence: Professor Samuel Lévy, Division of Cardiology, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrelly, 13015 Marseilles, France. E-mail: slevy{at}ap-hm.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.