Skip Navigation

Europace 2001 3(1):46-51; doi:10.1053/eupc.2000.0143
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Umemura, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Umemura, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


PACING

Optimal atrioventricular delay setting determined by evoked QT interval in patients with implanted stimulus-T-driven DDDR pacemakers

T. Ishikawa, T. Sugano, S. Sumita, T. Nakagawa, K. Hanada, M. Kosuge, I. Kobayashi, K. Kimura, O. Tochikubo, T. Usui and S. Umemura

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine Yokohama, Japan

Abstract

Cardiac function is improved by optimizing the atrioventricular (AV) delay. An automatic optimizing function of AV delay may be necessary to achieve the most favourable haemodynamic state in paced patients. The QT interval may change when cardiac function is improved by optimizing the AV delay. The QT or stimulus-T interval is used as a sensor for rate-responsive pacemakers. Evoked (e) QT interval is measured as the time duration from the ventricular pace pulse (stimulus) and the T-sense point that is the steepest point of the intracardiac T wave (stimulus-T interval). The relationship between AV delay, eQT interval and cardiac function was studied in 10 patients (73±10 (SD) years old) with an implanted stimulus-T-driven DDDR pacemaker. Cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were measured by Swan-Ganz catheter. The AV delay was prolonged stepwise by 30 ms. Electrocardiogram event markers which indicated ventricular spike and sensed T wave were recorded, and the interval between two event markers was measured as eQT interval. When AV delay was changed from 240 ms to the AV delay at which CO was maximal (172±33 ms), eQT interval prolonged from 346±60 to 353±62 ms (P< 0·01). There was a significant positive correlation between the optimal AV delay at which CO was maximal (172±33 ms) and the optimal AV delay which was predicted from the maximum eQT interval (179±37 ms, r=0·92, P< 0·001). When AV delay was changed from 240 ms to the predicted optimal AV delay, CO increased from 4·2±0·7 to 4·5± 0·8 l . min–1(P< 0·001) and PCWP was decreased from 7·1±4·0 to 5·7±3·1 mmHg (P< 0·05). In conclusion, the optimal AV delay can be predicted from the eQT interval which is sensed by an implanted pacemaker. Automatic setting of the optimal AV delay may be achieved by the QT sensor of an implanted pacemaker.

Key Words: PQ interval, QT interval, DDD pacemaker, atrioventricular block, cardiac output, sensors


Correspondence: Toshiyuki Ishikawa, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
C. R. Tomczak, W. Wojcik, E. F.G. Busse, and R. G. Haennel
Phase I and Phase II Oxygen Uptake Kinetics During Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony in Chronotropically Competent Pacemaker Patients
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1782 - 1789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.