Skip Navigation

Europace 2001 3(1):39-45; doi:10.1053/eupc.2000.0144
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sosnowski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tendera, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sosnowski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tendera, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


HEART RATE VARIABILITY

Scatterplots of RR and RT interval variability bring evidence for diverse non-linear dynamics of heart rate and ventricular repolarization duration in coronary heart disease

M. Sosnowski, Z. Czyz and M. Tendera

3rd Division of Cardiology, Silesian School of Medicine, Silesian Medical Centre Katowice, Poland

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: QT interval prolongation and increased spatial QT dispersion are important factors increasing the risk in coronary heart disease. The authors studied the spontaneous beat-to-beat variability of ventricular repolarization (RT intervals) in normal subjects and in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) in order to define the determinants of abnormal temporal dispersion.

METHODS: Seventy-six patients with a history of MI (17 female, 59 male, aged 52±10 years) comprised the study group. Forty-seven patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF≥40%, MI-A) and 29 patients had left ventricular dysfunction (EF<40%, MI-B). Twenty healthy volunteers (6 female, 14 male, aged 25±5 years) were included as the control group. An ECG signal of 512 heartbeats was recorded in the supine position. After analogue-to-digital conversion (16 bit, 2 kHz), the fiducial points of the R wave and T wave were determined. The RR and RT variability (V) assessed in the time domain as the standard deviations of RR and RT (ms), as well as the coefficients of scatterplots of RR and RT intervals.

RESULTS: As expected, the standard deviation of RR was significantly reduced in MI patients. The magnitude of RTV in the time domain was similar in the controls and in both subgroups of MI patients. The complexity of heart rate variability (HRV) was slightly, but significantly, reduced in the MI-B group, but not significantly in the MI-A heart group. The complexity of RTV behaved in the opposite manner, being increased in both MI subgroups with the lower mean in the MI-B patients. The different behaviour of HRV and RTV was indicated by the increased ratio of RR/RT coefficients, which reached a significantly greater value in the MI-B group.

CONCLUSION: The authors have described different patterns of scatterplot of short-term HRV and RTV in normal subjects, which confirmed that RTV is a less complex phenomenon than HRV. In patients after MI, the complexity of HRV diminishes, while the complexity of RTV increases. These opposing changes are more pronounced in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. A possible prognostic value of this feature is unknown and remains to be elucidated in future prospective studies.

Key Words: Complexity, temporal dispersion, computerised electrocardiograms


Correspondence: M. Sosnowski, 3rd Division of Cardiology, Silesian School of Medicine, Silesian Medical Centre, Ziolowa St. 47, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.