Skip Navigation

Europace 2000 2(4):333-338; doi:10.1053/eupc.2000.0119
© 2000 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saborowski, F.
Right arrow Articles by Schaldach, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saborowski, F.
Right arrow Articles by Schaldach, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

The effects of orthostasis on the ventricular-evoked response

F. Saborowski1, G. Krahé-Fritsch1, M. Krakau1, K. Wallbrueck2 and M. Schaldach2

1Medizinische Klinik, Krankenhaus Holweide Köln; 2Zentralinstitut für Biomedizinische Technik der Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Germany

Abstract

AIMS: The effects of orthostasis on the morphology of the ventricular-evoked response were investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven patients (five females; 74·9±4·6 years) with second- or third-degree atrioventricular block received DDD pacemakers Physios CTM 01 with fractal-coated ventricular leads (both Biotronik, Germany). At their 3-month follow-up sessions, these patients underwent tilt-table tests. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and ventricular-evoked response were measured continuously. Signals were averaged over 15 consecutive beats. Coefficients of correlation between selected ventricular-evoked response parameters and heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure were calculated.

Tilt upwards affected heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and ventricular-evoked response extremes showed non-uniform, patient-specific changes that were not related directly to other parameters. Heart rates significantly increased in six patients following tilt upwards. For all patients, ventricular-evoked response plateau amplitudes immediately increased with tilt upwards. Furthermore, repolarization times correlated with changes in heart rates (r=–0·78).

CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of the ventricular-evoked response during tilt-table testing revealed that the plateau amplitude of the ventricular-evoked response depends on the patient's position; ventricular-evoked response increased in the upright position and decreased in the supine position. Furthermore, repolarization time and heart rate correlated inversely; higher heart rates resulted in a shortening of the ventricular-evoked response.

Key Words: Ventricular-evoked response, orthostasis, tilt-table test

Correspondence: F. Saborowski, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Krankenhaus Holweide, Medizinische Klinik, D-51058 Köln, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.