Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on August 6, 2009
Europace 2009 11(9):1177-1182; doi:10.1093/europace/eup202
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/9/1177    most recent
eup202v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronborg, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mortensen, P. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronborg, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mortensen, P. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


Pacing and CRT

Long-term clinical outcome and left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Mads Brix Kronborg1,*, Andi Eie Albertsen2, Jens Cosedis Nielsen1 and Peter Thomas Mortensen1

1 Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Bendstrupgaardsvej 100, DK- 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; 2 Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark

Aims: To identify the predictive value of a presumed optimal left ventricular lead positions (LV-Ps) on the long-term clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods and results: Clinical information was collected from patient files in consecutive patients treated with CRT from 1997 to 2007. A presumed optimal LV-Ps were defined as a position between 2 and 5 o'clock in the short-axis circumference and basal or mid-ventricular in the long axis. Symptomatic response was defined as improvement in NYHA class (≥1) and echocardiographic response as improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥5% absolute. We included 567 patients [median age 66 years, 453 (80%) male]. The LV-Ps were optimal in 334 (59%) patients. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality with an optimal LV-Ps was unadjusted 0.79 (0.59–1.06) and adjusted 0.99 (0.71–1.40). The odds ratio (OR) for symptomatic response with an optimal LV-Ps was unadjusted 1.13 (0.79–1.64) and adjusted 1.05 (0.67–1.64), and the OR for echocardiographic response was unadjusted 1.60 (1.02–2.49) and adjusted 1.42 (0.88–2.31).

Conclusion: A presumed optimal LV-Ps between 2 and 5 o'clock in the short-axis circumference and basal or mid-ventricular in the long axis is not associated with a lower mortality or a better clinical response in patients treated with CRT.

Key Words: Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Biventricular pacing, Left ventricular leads, Mortality, Heart failure


* Corresponding author. Tel: +45 89 49 62 34, Fax: +45 89 49 60 02, Email: mads.brix.kronborg{at}ki.au.dk or mbk5{at}hotmail.com

Manuscript submitted 12 May 2009. Accepted after revision 29 June 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. B. Kronborg, J. C. Nielsen, and P. T. Mortensen
Electrocardiographic patterns and long-term clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy
Europace, November 14, 2009; (2009) eup364v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.