Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2008
Europace 2009 11(2):200-205; doi:10.1093/europace/eun328
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/2/200    most recent
eun328v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Europace
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etsadashvili, K.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Etsadashvili, K.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Leads and Lead Extraction

Long-term results of high vs. normal impedance ventricular leads on actual (Real-Life) pacemaker generator longevity

Kakhaber Etsadashvili1,*, Florian Hintringer1, Markus Stühlinger1, Wolfgang Dichtl1, Karin Spuller1, Herwig Antretter2, Herbert Hangler2, Otmar Pachinger1, Franz Xaver Roithinger3 and Thomas Berger1

1 Clinical Department of Cardiology Medical University Innsbruck Anichstrasse 35 A – 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; 2 Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Innsbruck, Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Landesklinikum Mödling, Mödling, Austria

Aim: The long-term effects of high impedance vs. standard impedance pacing leads on actual generator longevity were studied.

Methods and results: In 40 patients (21 females, age 73 ± 13 years) with standard dual-chamber pacemaker indication, bipolar standard impedance ventricular leads and high-impedance leads were implanted in a randomized fashion. Identical pacemaker generators and atrial pacing leads were implanted in all patients. Patients were observed during a mean follow-up of 89.8 ± 8.8 months before pacemaker replacement. Initially, the patients who received the high-impedance leads had a lower current drain as compared with standard pacing impedance leads, and the estimated pacemaker longevity was significantly prolonged, too. But this pattern disappeared after 6 years of follow-up, and finally the actual pacemaker generators’ replacement time was 86.7 ± 6.8 months in standard impedance lead group vs. 91.2 ± 10.3 months in high-impedance lead group (P = 0.17).

Conclusion: Implantation of high pacing impedance leads for ventricular stimulation does not result in a benefit with respect to pacemaker longevity as compared with standard impedance leads.

Key Words: Pacemaker generator longevity, Ventricular lead, High impedance, Current drain, Pacemaker follow-up, Effective replacement time


* Corresponding author. Tel: +43 512 5048 1306, Fax: +43 512 5042 3264, Email: ekt_guli{at}yahoo.com

Manuscript submitted 8 September 2008. Accepted after revision 7 November 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Europace:

Leads and longevity: how long will your pacemaker last?
Richard K. Shepard and Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
Europace 2009 11: 142-143. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. K. Shepard and K. A. Ellenbogen
Leads and longevity: how long will your pacemaker last?
Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 142 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.