Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on October 31, 2009
Europace 2009 11(12):1696-1701; doi:10.1093/europace/eup338
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/12/1696    most recent
eup338v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hausenloy, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hausenloy, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


Syncope and implantable loop

Blood pressure oscillations during tilt testing as a predictive marker of vasovagal syncope

Derek John Hausenloy1,*, Chanpreet Arhi2, Navin Chandra3, Ann-Christine Franzen-McManus4, Andrea Meyer4 and Richard Sutton4

1 The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London Hospital and Medical School, 67 Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6HX, UK; 2 Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK; 3 King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK; 4 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK

Aims: During head-up tilt (HUT) testing, a period of haemodynamic instability, marked by oscillations in blood pressure, often precedes vasovagal syncope. We hypothesized that the presence of oscillations in blood pressure during HUT testing predicts a positive diagnosis for vasovagal syncope.

Methods and results: The haemodynamic profiles of 42 consecutive patients non-responsive to passive HUT and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) provocation (‘non-responders’) and, contemporaneously, 41 consecutive patients responsive to passive HUT and GTN provocation (‘responders’) were assigned oscillation-positive or oscillation-negative depending on the presence or absence of a characteristic oscillation in systolic blood pressure which varied by ≥30 mmHg (peak-to-trough). All the non-responders proceeded to an isoprenaline (Iso) challenge test. Of the 42 non-responders, 27 patients were Iso tilt-positive; all of these patients were assigned oscillation-positive. The other 15 non-responders were Iso tilt-negative; of these 9 were assigned oscillation-positive and 6 were assigned oscillation-negative. Of the 41 responder patients, 33 were assigned oscillation-positive, whereas 8 were assigned oscillation-negative. Overall, the presence of oscillations as a diagnostic predictor for vasovagal syncope had a sensitivity of 88% (positive predictive value of 87%) and a specificity of 40% (negative predictive value of 43%).

Conclusion: In patients non-responsive to passive HUT and GTN provocation, the presence of an oscillating systolic blood pressure varying ≥30 mmHg may still indicate a diagnosis of vasovagal syncope, possibly obviating the need for Iso testing.

Key Words: Head-up tilt, Vasovagal syncope, Blood pressure, Oscillations


* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 207 380 9776, Fax: +44 207 388 5095, Email: d.hausenloy{at}ucl.ac.uk

Manuscript submitted 18 June 2009. Accepted after revision 3 October 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.