Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on October 8, 2009
Europace 2009 11(11):1522-1528; doi:10.1093/europace/eup294
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/11/1522    most recent
eup294v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, H.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, Y.-L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, H.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, Y.-L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


Electrocardiography and Risk Stratification

Risk stratification by T-wave morphology for cardiovascular mortality in patients with systolic heart failure

Hui-Chun Huang1 {dagger}, Lian-Yu Lin1 {dagger}, Hsi-Yu Yu2 and Yi-Lwun Ho1,3,*

1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan; 2 Division of Cardiology, Departments of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; 3 Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan

Aims: The objective was to investigate the prognostic value of T-wave morphology in systolic heart failure patients. T-wave morphology descriptors on standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) have been shown to have prognostic importance concerning the arrhythmic susceptibility of patients with previous myocardial infarction. However, these descriptors have not been considered with regard to further risk stratification in patients with systolic heart failure.

Methods and results: Patients with systolic heart failure [defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%] were enrolled. Standard digitized 12-lead ECGs were used for analysis of T-wave morphology descriptors [lead dispersion, T-wave morphology dispersion, percentage of the loop area, percentage of the outer area, and the total cosine between QRS and T-wave (TCRT)]. A total of 650 patients with a mean age of 63 ± 14 years were enrolled and followed-up for 2.7 ± 1.8 years. The mean LVEF was 36 ± 9%. During this study, the total mortality rate was 32.7% and cardiovascular mortality rate was 22.3%. A stepwise backward Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular mortality was significantly associated with age (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.022), haemoglobin (P = 0.001), LVEF (P = 0.001), and TCRT (P = 0.003). On the basis of a median TCRT of –0.473 as a cut-off point, a significant difference in cardiovascular mortality was observed from a Kaplan–Meier survival curve (P = 0.01). Total cosine between QRS and T-wave further stratified the risk of LVEF (P = 0.007), age (P = 0.001), haemoglobin (P < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001) in cardiovascular mortality for these patients.

Conclusion: Total cosine between QRS and T-wave may provide further risk stratification for and therefore impact on the prognosis of patients with systolic heart failure.

Key Words: T-wave morphology, Total cosine between QRS and T-wave, Systolic heart failure, Cardiovascular disease mortality


* Corresponding author. Tel: +886 2 2312 3456, ext 65438, Fax: +886 2 23515811, Email: ylho{at}ntu.edu.tw

{dagger} These authors contributed equally to the work.

Manuscript submitted 8 May 2009. Accepted after revision 6 September 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.