Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on September 29, 2009
Europace 2009 11(11):1501-1504; doi:10.1093/europace/eup263
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/11/1501    most recent
eup263v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, P. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Leads and Lead Extraction

Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: a single-centre study of electrosurgical and laser extraction

Paul A. Scott1,2,*, Whitney Chow1, Elizabeth Ellis1, John M. Morgan1,2 and Paul R. Roberts1,2

1 Wessex Cardiothoracic Unit, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; 2 University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Aims: Both electrosurgical dissection (EDS) and laser tools are effective in the extraction of chronic implanted endovascular leads. It is unclear which is superior. We undertook a retrospective single-centre study to assess this.

Methods and results: In our institution from 2000 to 2004, all extractions requiring an ablative sheath were performed using the EDS system. In 2004, an excimer laser system was acquired, which became the first choice. Consecutive patients undergoing extraction requiring an ablative sheath (EDS or laser) were studied. From 2000 to 2007, 140 leads were extracted from 74 patients (EDS 31 and laser 43). Procedural success was non-significantly higher in the laser vs. the EDS group (95 vs. 87%). In the EDS group, one patient suffered tamponade requiring surgery; in the laser group, one patient suffered a significant pericardial effusion treated conservatively. There were no deaths. Procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar between groups. More patients were referred for primary surgical extraction in the EDS vs. the laser era (7 vs. 0, P = 0.003).

Conclusion: Lead extraction using an ablative sheath is safe and effective. In our small study, there were no significant differences between EDS and laser sheaths in terms of success, time, or safety.

Key Words: Pacemaker, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Electrophysiology, Lead extraction, Laser, Diathermy

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 2380 798487, Fax: +44 2380 796614. Email: paul.andrew.scott{at}btinternet.com

Manuscript submitted 15 June 2009. Accepted after revision 20 August 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.