Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on August 6, 2009
Europace 2009 11(11):1456-1461; doi:10.1093/europace/eup218
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/11/1456    most recent
eup218v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Europace
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silberbauer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sulke, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silberbauer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sulke, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


Atrial Fibrillation and Pacing

The relationship between high-frequency right ventricular pacing and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation burden

John Silberbauer1,*, Rick A. Veasey1, Nick Freemantle2, Anita Arya1, Lana Boodhoo1 and Neil Sulke1

1 Cardiology Department, Eastbourne General Hospital, East Sussex NHS Trust Kings Drive, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, UK; 2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Aims: Right ventricular pacing increases the risk of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in the long term. The effects of right ventricular pacing on paroxysmal AF (PAF) are unknown. The aim was to examine the effect of right ventricular pacing on AF burden (AFB) in patients with symptomatic drug-resistant PAF. Pooled analysis of pacemaker-derived counters and AF diagnostic data from the Atrial Fibrillation Therapy (AFT) and Pacemaker Atrial Fibrillation Suppression (PAFS) randomized anti-AF pacemaker algorithm trials were used.

Methods and results: Five hundred and fifty-four patients from the AFT (n = 372) and PAFS (n = 182) were studied. The individual percentages of pacing, Atrial Sense Ventricular Pace (ASVP), Atrial Pace Ventricular Pace (APVP), and Atrial Pace Ventricular Sense (APVS) as well as total ventricular pacing during synchronous rhythm (VPinSR, %) were examined for an effect on AFB. Three hundred and twenty-one (AFT, age 64 ± 11, 55% male) and 79 (PAFS, age 71 ± 8, 54% male) patients had complete data for analysis. Increased VPinSR was weakly associated with an increased AFB (effect size—10% VPinSR increased AFB by only 0.03%) in AFT (P = 0.04) but not PAFS (P = 0.98) or the pooled analysis (P = 0.95). None of the synchronous paced modalities (ASVP, APVP, APVS) significantly increased AFB compared with sinus rhythm (Atrial Sense Ventricular Sense) (P = ns).

Conclusion: No pacing modality, atrial or ventricular, had a significant effect on AFB. On the basis of these data, the detrimental effect of high-frequency right ventricular pacing on AFB in paced PAF patients, unlike with persistent AF, appears to be minimal in the short term.

Key Words: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Atrial fibrillation burden, Right ventricular pacing


* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 1323 435 869, Fax: +44 1323 435 821, Email: johnsilberbauer{at}lycos.com

Manuscript submitted 9 March 2009. Accepted after revision 19 July 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Europace:

Right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation: villain, victim, or just misunderstood?
Michael O. Sweeney
Europace 2009 11: 1413-1414. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. O. Sweeney
Right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation: villain, victim, or just misunderstood?
Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(11): 1413 - 1414.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.