Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on July 31, 2009
Europace 2009 11(10):1359-1361; doi:10.1093/europace/eup193
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/10/1359    most recent
eup193v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Europace
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turley, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Plummer, C. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turley, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Plummer, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


Syncope and Implantable Loop Recorders

Time to manual activation of implantable loop recorders—implications for programming recording period: a 10-year single-centre experience

Andrew John Turley*, Margaret Mary Tynan and Christopher John Plummer

Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK

Aim: A new generation of commercially available implantable loop recorders (ILRs) has improved arrhythmia detection algorithms but reduced manually activated ECG storage duration. We investigated the effect that this would have had on symptom-arrhythmia correlation in a retrospective patient cohort.

Method and results: Retrospective review of all patients receiving a Medtronic® Reveal 9525/9526 for the investigation of unexplained syncope or pre-syncope in our centre between 1998 and 2008. All ILRs were programmed for a single manual activation with 40 min retrospective ECG recording. We identified all patients who subsequently underwent permanent pacemaker implantation and analysed the time delay between bradycardia onset and manual ILR activation. Five hundred and sixty-four patients underwent implantation of an ILR during the study period. Of these, 57 (10%) subsequently underwent the implantation of a pacemaker (31 male, median age 66 years, range 9–86 years). In this group, 35 of 57 (61%) bradycardia diagnoses were made in patients (18 male, median age 65 years, range 9–86 years) after manual activation of the ILR. The median time from bradycardia onset to ILR activation was 136 s (0–488 s). Nineteen recordings showed high-grade atrio-ventricular block and 16 sinus node disease.

Conclusion: Ten-year experience with the ILR confirms its utility in establishing a pacemaker indication as the cause for syncope or pre-syncope in 6% (34 of 564) of recipients following manual activation. This requires a recording loop of sufficient duration to reliably include both symptoms and activation.

Key Words: Permanent pacemaker, Implantable loop recorder, Syncope, Pre-syncope, Arrhythmia


* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 191 233 6161, Fax: +44 191 223 1400, Email: a.turley{at}btopenworld.com

Manuscript submitted 20 January 2009. Accepted after revision 25 June 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Europace:

Implantable loop recorders for assessment of syncope: is ‘Saint Thomas approach’ still the best diagnostic strategy?
Angelo Bartoletti
Europace 2009 11: 1262-1264. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Bartoletti
Implantable loop recorders for assessment of syncope: is 'Saint Thomas approach' still the best diagnostic strategy?
Europace, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1262 - 1264.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.