Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on August 6, 2009
Europace 2009 11(10):1301-1307; doi:10.1093/europace/eup220
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/10/1301    most recent
eup220v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hegbom, F.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hegbom, F.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


Atrial Fibrillation - clinical issues

Effects of angiotensin receptor blockade on serial P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiograms after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

Finn Hegbom1,*, Arnljot Tveit2, Irene Grundvold1, Harald Arnesen1 and Pal Smith2

1 Department of Cardiology, Ulleval University Hospital, 0407 Oslo, Norway; 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Asker and Baerum Hospital, 1309 Rud, Norway

Aims: To evaluate the effects of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan on P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram (P-SAECG) after electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and results: One hundred and seventy-one patients with persistent AF were randomized to receive candesartan 8 mg/day or placebo for 3–6 weeks before and candesartan 16 mg/day or placebo for 6 months after electrical cardioversion. P-SAECG was recorded in 114 patients (57 in each treatment group) after cardioversion and repeated in those with sinus rhythm at 1 and 6 weeks, and 3 and 6 months. Filtered P-wave duration (FPD), root-mean-squared (RMS) voltages of the terminal 40 ms of the filtered P-wave, RMS voltage of the entire filtered P-wave, and the integral of the voltages in the entire PD were analysed. No effects of candesartan were observed on any P-SAECG parameter at baseline. In the subgroup of patients in sinus rhythm after 6 months, FPD was significantly shorter both at baseline (151 ± 16 vs. 163 ± 16 ms) and at 6 months (143 ± 12 vs. 153 ± 15 ms) in the candesartan (n = 15) compared with the placebo group (n = 21).

Conclusion: Treatment with candesartan was associated with a shorter FPD in patients remaining in sinus rhythm for 6 months.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, Cardioversion, P-SAECG, Angiotensin blocker


* Corresponding author. Tel: +47 22119448, Fax: +47 22119060, Email: finn.hegbom{at}medisin.uio.no

Manuscript submitted 23 April 2009. Accepted after revision 16 July 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.