Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on November 5, 2008
Europace 2009 11(1):70-74; doi:10.1093/europace/eun302
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/70    most recent
eun302v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Europace
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fragakis, N.
Right arrow Articles by Katsaris, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fragakis, N.
Right arrow Articles by Katsaris, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Atrial Fibrillation

Acute beta-adrenoceptor blockade improves efficacy of ibutilide in conversion of atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular rate

Nikolaos Fragakis*, Athanasios Bikias, Ioannis Delithanasis, Melania Konstantinidou, Nikolaos Liakopoulos, Miltiadis Kozirakis and George Katsaris

2nd Cardiology Department, General Hospital G. Papanikolaou, Exochi, Thessaloniki, Greece

Aims: Activation of beta-adrenoceptors attenuates prolongation of action potential duration induced by blockade of the delayed rectifier potassium current. We examined whether acute administration of beta-blocker could enhance ibutilide (IB) efficacy in conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) with a rapid ventricular rate.

Methods and results: Ninety patients (aged 63 ± 13.5 years) with rapidly conducting AF were randomized in to two groups. Group A (n = 44) received esmolol titrated to achieve a heart rate of <100 bpm followed by IB co-administration, while Group B (n = 46) were treated with IB as monotherapy. In Group A, 29 patients (67%) converted to sinus rhythm (SR) compared with 21 (46%) in Group B (P = 0.04). The use of esmolol was the most important predictor for cardioversion (P = 0.009). The slower the heart rate at the time of IB initiation, the higher the likelihood for cardioversion (P = 0.015). Patients in Group A had significantly shorter corrected QT interval (QTc) at the time of conversion than those in Group B (433 vs. 501 ms, P = 0.003). Two patients in Group A developed severe bradycardia, whereas three patients in Group B developed severe ventricular tachycardia (VT).

Conclusion: Compared with IB monotherapy, the combination therapy of esmolol and IB appears to be more effective in conversion of rapidly conducting AF back to SR. The addition of beta-blocker reduces QTc prolongation and diminishes the risk of VT at the expense, however, of increased bradycardic events.

Key Words: Ibutilide, Esmolol, Cardioversion, Atrial fibrillation


* Corresponding author. Tel: +30 694 426 7643; fax: +30 231 330 7676. E-mail address: nfrag{at}vodafone.net.gr

Manuscript submitted 1 July 2008. Accepted after revision 13 October 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Europace:

Ibutilide revisited: stronger and safer than ever
Rakesh Gopinathannair and Brian Olshansky
Europace 2009 11: 9-10. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. Gopinathannair and B. Olshansky
Ibutilide revisited: stronger and safer than ever
Europace, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 9 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.