Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on November 13, 2008
Europace 2009 11(1):26-30; doi:10.1093/europace/eun317
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/26    most recent
eun317v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birnie, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Amyotte, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birnie, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Amyotte, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

No long-term psychological morbidity living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator under advisory: the Medtronic Marquis experience

David H. Birnie1,*, Samuel F. Sears2,3, Martin S. Green1, Robert Lemery1, Michael H. Gollob1 and Barbara Amyotte1

1 University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4W7; 2 Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, 215 Rawl Hall, Greenville, NC 27858-4353, USA; 3 Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), East Carolina University, 215 Rawl Hall, Greenville, NC 27858-4353, USA

Aims: It is unclear whether there is important psychological morbidity associated with living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) under advisory and whether this should be factored into decision-making.

Methods and results: Our study focused on patients living with advisory Medtronic Marquis ICDs. Patient adjustment to the ICD was evaluated using a validated device-specific metric of patient acceptance, the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS). A comparison group of patients with other models of ICDs that were not under an advisory also completed the study measure. The questionnaire return rate was 86/122 (70.5%) in the advisory group and 94/134 (70.1%) in the non-advisory group. Only one patient in our clinic elected for generator change due to severe anxiety. There were no differences in demographic or clinical variables between the groups. There were no differences in the mean total FPAS score between the two patient groups (advisory patients 85.97 ± 14.95 and 86.23 ± 15.76 for non-advisory, P=0.340). Also there were no differences in any of the subscores. Correlates of poor device acceptance were younger age and a history of electrical storm.

Conclusion: We found no evidence of increased long-term psychological morbidity in patients living with an ICD under advisory compared with patients with an ICD not under advisory. Our data suggest that patients and physicians should avoid hasty decisions about ICD replacement for psychological reasons.

Key Words: Psychological morbidity, ICD, Advisory, Recall, Anxiety


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 613 761 4914; fax: +1 613 761 4407. E-mail address: dbirnie{at}ottawaheart.ca

Manuscript submitted 29 August 2008. Accepted after revision 27 October 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Cevik, A. Perez-Verdia, and K. Nugent
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and their role in heart failure progression
Europace, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 710 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.