Skip Navigation

Europace 2008 10(Supplement 3):iii101-iii105; doi:10.1093/europace/eun221
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, E. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, E. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Europace issue: Spotlight Issue: Cardiac Imaging in EP and CRT [View the issue table of contents]

IMAGING IN CRT

Is nuclear imaging a viable alternative technique to assess dyssynchrony?

Ji Chen1,*, Jeroen J. Bax2, Maureen M. Henneman2, Mark J. Boogers2 and Ernest V. Garcia1

1 Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; 2 Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has shown benefits in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) (NYHA class III or IV), depressed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and prolonged QRS duration (>120 ms). However, at least 30% of the patients who meet the above criteria show no response to CRT. It has shown with echocardiography that the presence of LV mechanical dyssynchrony is an important predictor for response to CRT. However, echocardiography requires expertise to produce reproducible and reliable results. The recent report from the Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy trial showed that under ‘real-world’ conditions the current available echocardiographic techniques including tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and myocardial strain-rate imaging are not ready for routine clinical practice to assess LV dyssynchrony. It suggested that there is a need for better standardization and refinements of the echocardiographic screening tools currently used for the evaluation of LV dyssynchrony. This article reviews a technique such as phase analysis that allows measuring LV dyssynchrony from conventional electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with no additional procedure. Its advantages over TDI are its automation, repeatability, and reproducibility that are very promising in improving prediction of CRT response in HF patients.

Key Words: Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Left ventricular dyssynchrony, ECG-gated SPECT, Myocardial perfusion imaging

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 404 712 4024; fax: +1 404 712 7961. E-mail address: jchen22{at}emory.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.