Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on May 28, 2008
Europace 2008 10(7):809-815; doi:10.1093/europace/eun135
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/7/809    most recent
eun135v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Europace
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Silva, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Silva, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in atrial fibrillation patients vs. patients in sinus rhythm: the role of atrioventricular junction ablation

António M. Ferreira*, Pedro Adragão, Diogo M. Cavaco, Rui Candeias, Francisco B. Morgado, Katya R. Santos, Emília Santos and José A. Silva

Hospital Santa Cruz—Av. Prof. Reynaldo dos Santos, 2794-035 Carnaxide, Portugal

Aims: To assess the clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with patients in sinus rhythm (SR), and to evaluate the impact of atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation on the outcome of AF patients undergoing CRT.

Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 131 consecutive heart failure (HF) patients who underwent CRT implantation. Three groups were considered: SR (n = 78), AF with AVJ ablation (n = 26), and AF without AVJ ablation (n = 27). Patients were evaluated for the occurrence of cardiac death, hospitalization for HF, and responsiveness to CRT (survival with improvement of ≥1 New York Heart Association class at 6 months). The three groups showed a significant improvement in functional class. However, the proportion of responders was significantly lower in AF patients without AVJ ablation (52 vs. 79% in SR and 85% in AF with AVJ ablation, P < 0.008). Atrial fibrillation without AVJ ablation was also independently associated with mortality (HR 5.22, 95% CI: 1.60–17.01, P = 0.006) and hospitalization for HF during the first 12 months (HR 6.23, 95% CI: 2.09–18.54, P = 0.001). The outcomes of AF with AVJ ablation patients were similar to the outcomes of patients in SR.

Conclusion: Sinus rhythm and AF patients display similar survival and clinical improvement after CRT implantation, provided that AVJ ablation is performed in the latter.

Key Words: Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization, Atrial fibrillation, Atrioventricular junction ablation


* Corresponding author. Tel: +351 210433129; fax: +351 214188095 E-mail address: miguelferreira.md{at}sapo.pt

Manuscript submitted 31 October 2007. Accepted after revision 8 February 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Europace:

The ‘Happy Ending Problem’ of cardiac pacing? Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure after atrioventricular junction ablation
Tamas Szili-Torok, Attila Mihalcz, and Luc Jordaens
Europace 2008 10: 779-781. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. Szili-Torok, A. Mihalcz, and L. Jordaens
The 'Happy Ending Problem' of cardiac pacing? Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure after atrioventricular junction ablation
Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 779 - 781.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.