Europace Advance Access originally published online on April 22, 2008
Europace 2008 10(6):683-686; doi:10.1093/europace/eun094
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABLATION AND ABLATION TECHNIQUES
Impact of cryoablation catheter size on success rates in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia in 160 patients with long-term follow-up
Department of Cardiology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Level 4, Dolphin House, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
Aims: To determine the efficacy and safety of cryoablation for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and results: We analysed the procedural characteristics, acute success, and recurrence rates of 160 consecutive patients treated with cryoablation for the AVNRT and followed up for 18 months. Mean procedural time was 119.1 ± 3.7 min, with an average of 4.6 ± 0.2 Cryo lesions and an acute procedural success rate of 93%. Recurrence rates were 19 (11.9%) cases and were significantly higher in the 4 mm cryocatheter-treated group (12/59, 16.9%), compared with the 6 mm cryocatheter-treated group (9/101, 6.9%, P = 0.01). Recurrence rates were greater where slow pathway block was not achieved 8/12 (66.7%), compared with complete slow pathway block 11/129 (8.5%, P < 0.0001). Recurrence was significantly more likely if atrial echo beats were still present after cryoablation, 12/130 (9.2%) patients with no recurrence vs. 7/19 (36.8%) patients with recurrence (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Cryoablation is a safe and efficacious treatment for AVNRT. Complete slow pathway block is associated with long-term success, together with the use of the larger 6 mm cryocatheter. There is always a risk of heart block with radiofrequency ablation, although this experience confirms previous findings that the risk with Cryo is zero.
Key Words: Atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia, Cryoablation
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 117 342 0489; fax: +44 117 342 0496. E-mail address: tim.cripps{at}ubht.nhs.uk
Manuscript submitted 3 January 2008. Accepted after revision 24 March 2008.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Bastani, J. Schwieler, P. Insulander, F. Tabrizi, F. Braunschweig, G. Kenneback, N. Drca, B. Sadigh, and M. Jensen-Urstad Acute and long-term outcome of cryoablation therapy of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia Europace, July 4, 2009; (2009) eup177v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Y. Chan, N. S. Mok, C. L. Lau, Y. K. Lo, C. C. Choy, S. T. Lau, and Y. C. Choi Treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by cryoablation with a 6 mm-tip catheter vs. radiofrequency ablation Europace, May 17, 2009; (2009) eup121v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. De Sisti, J. Tonet, F. Gueffaf, F. Touil, J.-F. Leclercq, P. Aouate, J. Lacotte, F. Hidden-Lucet, and R. Frank Effects of inadvertent atrioventricular block on clinical outcomes during cryoablation of the slow pathway in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia Europace, December 1, 2008; 10(12): 1421 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
