Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on February 19, 2008
Europace 2008 10(4):419-424; doi:10.1093/europace/eun018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/4/419    most recent
eun018v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katritsis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ellenbogen, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katritsis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ellenbogen, K. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


'ABLATE AND PACE': STILL A VALID TREATMENT FOR AF

Long-term follow-up after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Demosthenes Katritsis1,*, Mark A. Wood2, Eleftherios Giazitzoglou1, Richard K. Shepard2, Georgia Kourlaba1 and Kenneth A. Ellenbogen2

1 Department of Cardiology, Athens Euroclinic, 9 Athanassiadou Street, Athens 11521, Greece; 2 Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Medical College of Virginia Hospital, Richmond, VA, USA

Aims: Data on long-term follow-up of patients who have undergone catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are very limited. This report aimed at presenting clinical outcome and AF-free survival after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation over an extended (>3 years) follow-up period.

Methods and results: Thirty-nine patients subjected to PV isolation for paroxysmal AF were followed-up for at least 3 years according to a strict protocol. Fourteen patients (35.8%) had one, 19 patients (50%) had two, and 6 patients (15.4%) had three ablation procedures. At end of follow-up (42.2 ± 6.0 months), 17 patients (43.5%) were completely free of AF or other atrial arrhythmia, and 26 patients (66.6%) had symptomatic improvement. The long-term success rate was 21.4% for patients subjected to a single ablation procedure, 52.6% for patients subjected to two catheter ablation procedures, and 66.7% for patients who underwent three ablation procedures (P = 0.094). There was also a trend for patients who underwent a combination of different ablation procedures (ostial, antral, and/or circumferential) to have a higher AF-free survival when compared with patients subjected to the same procedure (P-value for log-rank test = 0.036).

Conclusion: Catheter ablation does not eliminate paroxysmal AF in up to 56% of patients in the long term, despite the use of two or three ablation procedures in two-thirds of them. However, it confers symptomatic improvement in 67% of treated patients.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Long-term follow-up


* Corresponding author. Tel: +30 210 6416600; fax: +30 210 6416661. E-mail address: dkatritsis{at}euroclinic.gr

Manuscript submitted 22 November 2007. Accepted after revision 9 January 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Martignani, I. Diemberger, M. Biffi, C. Valzania, M. Bertini, and G. Boriani
How to assess the efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation?
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2008; 29(17): 2183 - 2184.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.