Skip Navigation

Europace 2008 10(3):358-363; doi:10.1093/europace/eun019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardiwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardiwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


ICDS

Right ventricular pacing is an independent predictor for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation occurrence and heart failure events in patients with an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator

Ajmal Gardiwal1 {dagger}, Hong Yu1 {dagger}, Hanno Oswald1, Ulrich Luesebrink1, Andreas Ludwig1, Andreas Maximilian Pichlmaier2, Helmut Drexler1 and Gunnar Klein1,*

1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; 2 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany

Aims: There is increasing evidence that right ventricular (RV) pacing may have detrimental effects by increasing morbidity and mortality for heart failure in implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) patients. In this study we prospectively tested the hypothesis that cumulative RV pacing increases ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) occurrence (primary endpoint) and hospitalization and mortality for heart failure (secondary endpoint) in a predominantly secondary prophylactic ICD patient population.

Methods and results: Two hundred and fifty patients were divided into two groups according to the median of cumulative RV pacing (≤2 vs. >2%) and prospectively followed-up for occurrence of primary and secondary endpoints for 18 ± 4 months. Established predictors for VT/VF occurrence and heart failure events such as age, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), QRS duration, history of atrial fibrillation, and NT-proBNP were collected at enrolment. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that cumulative RV pacing > 2% and EF < 40% were independent predictors for VT/VF occurrence and heart failure events. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with >2% cumulative RV pacing more frequently suffered from VT/VF occurrence and heart failure hospitalization.

Conclusion: Cumulative RV pacing > 2% and EF < 40% are independent predictors for VT/VF occurrence and mortality and hospitalization for heart failure in predominantly secondary prophylactic ICD patients. Our data show that algorithms capable of reducing cumulative RV pacing should be used more frequently in clinical practice.

Key Words: ICD, Heart failure, Right ventricular pacing, VT/VF


* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 511 5323817; fax: +49 511 5328475. E-mail address: gunnarklein{at}yahoo.de

{dagger} Both authors contributed equally to the study.

Manuscript submitted 25 October 2007. Accepted after revision 12 January 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.