Europace Advance Access originally published online on August 27, 2008
Europace 2008 10(10):1161-1169; doi:10.1093/europace/eun216
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 2 Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 3 Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; 4 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 5 Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Aims: Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method; (ii) evaluate the acute haemodynamic impact of CRT optimization performed during exercise.
Methods and results: Twenty-four heart failure patients, previously implanted with a CRT defibrillator, underwent AV and VV delay optimization, by echocardiography and IEGM methods, both at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Rest-to-exercise variations in optimal VV delay were observed in 58% of patients. Conversely, optimal AV delay did not change during exercise compared with rest. Substantial agreement of AV and VV delays was observed between both the optimization methods. Exercise optimization of VV delay by either method improved intraventricular dyssynchrony and increased aortic velocity time integral compared with the resting setting (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In patients implanted with a CRT device, optimal VV delay varied considerably from rest to exercise, while AV delay did not change. Re-assessment of the optimal pacing configuration during supine exercise, by echocardiography as well as IEGM methods, yielded an additional haemodynamic benefit to that provided by resting optimization.
Key Words: Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Optimization, Exercise, Echocardiography, Intracardiac electrogram
* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 (0) 51 344859; fax: +39 (0) 51 349858. E-mail address: cinzia.valzania2{at}studio.unibo.it
Manuscript submitted 10 April 2008. Accepted after revision 19 July 2008.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Stahlberg, M. Damgaard, P. Norsk, A. Gabrielsen, A. Sahlen, C. Linde, and F. Braunschweig Cardiac output response to changes of the atrioventricular delay in different body positions and during exercise in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy Europace, July 4, 2009; (2009) eup173v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
