Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on August 14, 2008
Europace 2008 10(10):1145-1151; doi:10.1093/europace/eun203
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
10/10/1145    most recent
eun203v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raatikainen, M.J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Linnaluoto, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raatikainen, M.J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Linnaluoto, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions©oxfordjournals.org.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up

M.J. Pekka Raatikainen1,*, Paavo Uusimaa1, Mireille M.E. van Ginneken2, Jacques P.G. Janssen2 and Markku Linnaluoto1

1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, 90014 Oulu, Finland; 2 Medtronic Bakken Research Center B.V., Maastricht, The Netherlands

Aims: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate whether internet-based remote monitoring offers a safe, practical, and cost-effective alternative to the in-office follow-up visits of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

Methods and results: Forty-one patients (62 ± 10 years, range 41–76, 83% male) with previously implanted ICD were followed for 9 months. One-hundred and nineteen scheduled and 18 unscheduled data transmissions were performed. There were no device-related adverse events. Over 90% of the patients found the system easy to use. Physicians reported the system as being ‘very easy’ or ‘easy’ to use and found the data comparable to traditional device interrogation in 99% of the cases. They were able to address all unscheduled data transmissions remotely. Compared with the in-office visits, remote monitoring required less time from patients (6.9 ± 5.0 vs. 182 ± 148 min, P < 0.001) and physicians (8.4 ± 4.5 vs. 25.8 ± 17.0 min, P < 0.001) to complete the follow-up. Substitution of two routine in-office visits during the study by remote monitoring reduced the overall cost of routine ICD follow-up by 524{euro} per patient (41%).

Conclusion: Remote monitoring offers a safe, feasible, time-saving, and cost-effective solution to ICD follow-up.

Key Words: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Remote monitoring, Usability, Cost-effectiveness

* Corresponding author. Tel: +358 8 315 3550; fax: +358 8 315 2127. E-mail address: pekka.raatikainen{at}oulu.fi

Manuscript submitted 25 February 2008. Accepted after revision 15 July 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EuropaceHome page
G. Andrikopoulos, S. Tzeis, G. Theodorakis, and P. Vardas
Monitoring capabilities of cardiac rhythm management devices
Europace, October 29, 2009; (2009) eup317v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EuropaceHome page
H. Burri and D. Senouf
Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators
Europace, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 701 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EuropaceHome page
F. Sacher, V. Probst, M. Bessouet, M. Wright, A. Maluski, S. Abbey, P. Bordachar, A. Deplagne, S. Ploux, G. Lande, et al.
Remote implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring in a Brugada syndrome population
Europace, April 1, 2009; 11(4): 489 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EuropaceHome page
J. E. Marine
Remote monitoring for prevention of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks: is there no place like home?
Europace, April 1, 2009; 11(4): 409 - 411.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.