Skip Navigation

Europace 1999 1(4):266-269; doi:10.1053/eupc.1999.0053
© 1999 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Karasik, P.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Karasik, P.E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

An abdominal active can defibrillator may facilitate a successful generator change when a lead failure is present

A.J. Solomon, J.B. Moubarak, J.M. Drood, C.M. Tracy and P.E. Karasik

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center and The Washington Veteran's Affairs Medical Center Washington, D.C. Washington, U.S.A.

AIMS: Defibrillator generator changes are frequently performed on patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in an abdominal pocket. These patients usually have epicardial patches or older endocardial lead systems. At the time of a defibrillator generator change defibrillation may be unsuccessful as a result of lead failure. We tested the hypothesis that an active can defibrillator implanted in the abdominal pocket could replace a non-functioning endocardial lead or epicardial patch.

METHODS AND RESULTS: An abdominal defibrillator generator change was performed in 10 patients, (mean age= 67±13 years, nine men). Initially, a defibrillation threshold (DFT) was obtained using a passive defibrillator and the chronic endocardial or epicardial lead system. DFTs were then performed using an active can emulator and one chronic lead to simulate endocardial or epicardial lead failure. We tested 30 lead configurations (nine endocardial and 21 epicardial). Although a DFT of 7·3±4·2 joules was obtained with the intact chronic lead system, the active can emulator and one endocardial or epicardial lead still yielded an acceptable DFT of 19·9±6·1 joules. In addition, a successful implant (DFT ≤24 joules) could have been accomplished in 28 of 30 (93%) lead configurations.

CONCLUSION: An active can defibrillator in an abdominal pocket may allow for a successful generator change in patients with defibrillator lead malfunction. This would be simpler than abandoning the abdominal implant and moving to a new pectoral device and lead or tunnelling a new endocardial electrode. However, loss of defibrillation capability with a particular complex lead may be a warning of impending loss of other functions (eg. sensing and/or pacing).

Key Words: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, active can

Correspondence: Allen J. Solomon, MD, Georgetown University Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Room M4222, 3800 Reservoir Road, N. W., Washington, D. C. 20007, U.S.A.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.