Skip Navigation

Europace 1999 1(3):187-191; doi:10.1053/eupc.1999.0037
© 1999 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holt, N.D.
Right arrow Articles by McComb, J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holt, N.D.
Right arrow Articles by McComb, J.M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Electrophysiological properties of the recipient atrial remnant after human orthotopic cardiac transplantation

N.D. Holt, K. Hetherington, S. Brady, J.H. Dark and J.M. McComb

Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.

AIMS: The recipient atrial remnant has been used as a control in studies of chronotropic response following orthotopic cardiac transplantation and as a trigger for the donor heart. It is not known, however, whether its function is normal. We investigated the electrophysiological properties of the recipient atrial remnant.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients were studied, mean age 49 years (range 20–63) and mean time post-orthotopic cardiac transplantation of 31 months (range 1–107). Recipient atrial rhythm, spontaneous cycle length and sinus node function were determined. Atrial fibrillation/flutter was identified in 10/50 (20%). Of those in sinus rhythm, significant bradycardia was present in 12/40 (30%). The mean spontaneous cycle length was 929 ± 188 ms. Three patients demonstrated variable atrial electrocardiogram morphology and a further three patients had marked variations in resting cycle length. The sinus node function was abnormal in 2/34 (6%).

CONCLUSIONS: Only 56% recipient atria had normal sinus rhythm, with 21% of these demonstrating features consistent with a wandering atrial pacemaker. The recipient atrial remnant is not normal in the majority of transplant recipients and should be used with caution in studies involving its use as a control or as a trigger for the donor heart.

Key Words: Cardiac transplantation, electrophysiology, recipient atrium, permanent pacemakers

Correspondence: Dr N. D. Holt, c/o Dr McComb's Secretary, Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, U. K.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EuropaceHome page
I. Can, K. Liao, and D. G. Benditt
Residual recipient right atrial tissue responsive to atropine 10 years following 'bi-caval' orthotopic heart-lung transplantation
Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 264 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EuropaceHome page
S. Lim and H. Marshall
Broad complex tachycardia and atrioventricular dissociation in a patient with heart transplant
Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 265 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.