Skip Navigation

Europace 1999 1(3):168-173; doi:10.1053/eupc.1999.0043
© 1999 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Boström, P.-A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Boström, P.-A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation

Feasibility and intermediate term follow-up

J. Brandt*, C.J. Höijer{dagger}, P. Wierup*, S. Juul-Möller{dagger} and P.-Å Boström{dagger}

*Division of Cardiac Surgery, Malmö University Hospital Malmö, Sweden; {dagger}Division of Cardiology, Malmö University Hospital Malmö, Sweden

AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and follow-up results of atrial lead implantation and a change to dual chamber pacing following long-term treatment with single chamber ventricular stimulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS: During a 30-month period, 70 consecutive patients with ventricular pacemakers were referred for pulse generator exchange or lead reoperation. Using defined criteria, an upgrade procedure was considered indicated in 34 of the cases (49%); these patients had a mean age of 74·8±8·8 years, and had been treated with VVI or VVIR pacing for a mean time of 7·8±3·8 years (range 1·8–17). An atrial lead was successfully implanted via ipsilateral subclavian venipuncture through the existing pectoral pacemaker pocket in 33 of the 34 cases (97% of the attempts). Postoperatively, one atrial lead dislodgement was seen, and another patient required atrial lead adjustment due to P wave undersensing. The mean follow-up period was 14±10 months. During this time, four patients developed permanent atrial fibrillation (annual incidence 11%). In 82% of the patients in whom an upgrade procedure was attempted, dual chamber pacing was maintained at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Restoration of AV synchrony is possible in a substantial proportion of patients treated with long-term ventricular stimulation. Atrial lead placement through ipsilateral subclavian venipuncture is generally feasible, and the vast majority of cases remain in dual chamber pacing with normal function during intermediate term follow-up.

Key Words: Dual chamber pacing, ventricular pacing, atrial pacemaker leads, atrial fibrillation


Correspondence: Johan Brandt, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.J Hoijer, J Brandt, R Willenheimer, S Juul-Moller, and P.-A Bostrom
Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2002; 23(6): 490 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
D.J.R. Hildick-Smith, A.A. Grace, and M.C. Petch
Permanet pacemaker upgrade
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 186 - 186.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.